Clarifying the Doubts
The Grave Mistake |
Past History From those early sects which denied îmân (firm faith) in the Punishment of the Grave were the Khawârij and a group from the Mu’tazilah. [1] The Mu’tazilah said: “Our scholars deny the Punishment of the Grave and its rewards.” [2] This is because they innovated a rule that only the mutawâtir ahâdîth amount to knowledge, whereas the authentic âhâd ahâdîth do not. And this saying of theirs, that the âhâd ahâdîth does not amount to knowledge means that such ahâdîth - in their false opinion - are not free from the possibility of falsehood nor error. Due to this innovated principle they denied those ahâdîth affirming that Punishment in the Grave is indeed a true fact and that it will definitely occur for the disbelievers and some of the sinful ones from this Ummah - may Allâh protect us from it - since these ahâdîth were to them of the âhâd category. So this false principle caused them to deny îmân in the Punishment of the Grave - not holding it as a part of ’aqîdah (belief) which is in total opposition to that of the Salafus-Sâlih (Pious Predecessors) and Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah who followed them. Present-Day Tragedy During the last few years, some of the young and innocent du’ât (callers to Islâm) have stumbled across the same innovated principle - that the authentic âhâd ahadîth does not amount to knowledge and therefore cannot be taken as proof for matters of ’aqîdah - causing a number of them to doubt [and to reject] that Punishment of the Grave is indeed a true fact; and that it was part of the ’aqîdah held fast to by our Salaf: The result is that discord - and its vile fruits - has raised its ugly head again amongst some of the precious youth of this Ummah, encircling them, just ... Text to be inserted ... as-Sam’ânî [5] - rahimahullâh - from ... Text to be inserted ... back to Allâh’s Messenger sallallâhu ’alayhi wa sallam, and it is accepted by the Scholars, then it necessitates knowledge, where it leads to knowledge. This is the saying of the great majority of the People of Hadîth and those who are precise and work to preserve the Sunnah. But this saying of theirs, that âhâd narration does not amount to knowledge and that it must be reported in mutawâtir form in order to result in knowledge, then this is something innovated by the Qadariyyah and the Mu’tazilah. There intention behind it was to reject the narrations. It (the principle) was seized from them, without understanding, by some Scholars of Fiqh - those who did not have a firm footing in knowledge, nor realise what the intent of this saying was.” [6] The Desired Hope So this article will attempt to clarify - by Allâh’s permission - that having îmân in the Punishment in the Grave is an obligation upon all Muslims and that it was indeed part of the ’aqîdah of our Salafus-Sâlih, previously being denied only by a group from amongst the Innovators. It is hoped that those who have erred from the way of the Salafus-Sâlih - the way of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah - would re-assess their stance in light of the evidences to be presented, hoping that they will return to the truth. “For indeed the truth is cherished by the Believer and in returning to it is nobility. Whereas remaining upon falsehood is a defect and is despicable.” [7] Remembering that: “The select and correct way is that which the Salafus-Sâlih were upon - that being the truth.” [8] Evidences from the Pure Sunnah We shall - for the sake of brevity - consider the evidences from the pure Sunnah and then look at the sayings of our Salafus-Sâlih - and the Scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah who followed them - omitting the evidences from Qur‘ân and its explanations from the Sahâbah and Tâbi’ûn. [i] ’Âishah - radiallâhu
’anhâ - said: [ii] Ibn ’Abbâs - radiallâhu
’anhumâ - said: [iii] Ibn Mas’ûd - radiallâhu
’anhu - said: [iv] Hânî, the freed slave of
’Uthmân, related: [v] From Abû Hurayrah - radiallâhu ’anhu: The Prophet sallallâhu ’alayhi wa sallam said: “When one of you finishes the last tashahhud, he should seek refuge in Allâh from four things: From the punishment of Hell, from the punishment of the Grave, from the trials of life and death and from the evil trials of Masîhud-Dajjâl.” [13] [vi] Umm Khâlid bint
Khâlid -
radiallâhu ’anhâ - said: The Sayings of the Salaf of this Ummah Now consider - O honourable reader - the sayings of our Salaf of this Ummah with respect to having ’aqîdah in the Punishment in the Grave. [1]
Sufyân ibn
’Uyainah (d.197H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [2] Imâm
ash-Shâfi’î (d.204H) rahimahullâh - said: [3] Imâm Ahmad (d.241H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [4] Abû Dâwûd (d.275H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [5] Ibn Qutaybah (d.278H)
rahimahullâh - said: [6]
Imâm at-Tahâwî (d.321H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [7] Abûl-Hasan al-Ash’arî (d.324H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [8]
Imâm al-Âjurrî (d.360H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [9] Ibn
Abî Hâtim (d.327H) - rahimahullâh - said: [10] Imâm al-Barbahârî (d.329H) - rahimahullâh - said: “Chapter: Questioning in the Grave and the Punishment of the grace and Munkir and Nakîr.” [26] [11] Al-Ismâ’îlî (d.371H) -
rahimahullâh - said: [12] Text to be
inserted ... [13] Ibn Abî Zamnîn (d.399H) -
rahimahullâh - said: |
[14] Imâm al-Lâlikâ‘î (d.418H) - rahimahullâh - said: Text to be inserted ... [15] Imâm al-Bayhaqî (d.458H) -
rahimahullâh - said: The Meaning of Îmân QUOTE REMOVED Thus, the Salaf agreed that îmân is: ’aqîdah, statement and action. So, whosoever denies ’aqîdah in the Punishment of the Grave, has likewise denied îmân in it. Since ’aqîdah in the heart is the foundation of îmân - about which there is agreement from the Scholars of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamâ’ah. Imâm al-Baghawî
(d.535H) - rahimahullâh - said: Having understood this, the falsehood of those who claim to have îmân in the Punishment of the Grave, whilst denying ’aqîdah in it, will become very clear. Since our Salafus-Sâlih held that the root of îmân in the Punishment in the Grave is to have ’aqîdah in it - so if there is no ’aqîdah in the Punishment of the Grave, then there is - by default - no îmân it it as well! The Grave Mistake It is thus clear, that the Salaf and those who followed them were agreed that Punishment in the Grave will definitely occur [for the disbelievers and some of the sinful ones from amongst the Muslims] and that it is obligatory to have îmân in it and to consider it as part of the Islâmic ’aqîdah - and no one whose saying is taken account of opposes them in that. However, the founder of the modernist party Hizbut-Tahrir, like the Mu’tazilah before, also denied ’aqîdah in the Punishment of the Grave explaining his position by saying: “Indeed, from them (the âhâd ahâdîth) are those which require and action, so it is acted upon. So from Abû Hurayrah who said: The Messenger of Allâh sallallâhu ’alayhi wa sallam said: “When any of you finishes the last tashahhud, he should seek refuge with Allâh from the four things: from the punishment of the HellFire, from the punishment of the Grave, from the trials of life and death and from the evil trials of the Dajâl.” And from ’Âishah: from the Prophet sallallâhu ’alayhi wa sallam, that he used to make supplication in the Prayer: “O Allâh! I seek refuge in You from the Punishment of the Grave, I seek refuge in You from the trials of the Masîhud-Dajjâl, I seek refuge in You from the trials of life and death. O Allâh! I seek refuge in You from debt and sin.” So these two ahâdîth are âhâd narrations and they contain the requirement of an action, i.e. to carry out this supplication after finishing the tashahhud. So it is recommended to make this supplication after finishing tashahhud and it is permissible to make tasdîq (attest) what is contained in them. However, what is harâm (forbidden) is to hold it with certainty - meaning: to have it as part of ones ’aqîdah - as long as it only been reported in the âhâd hadîth, a dhannî (non-mutawâtir) proof. However, if it occurs in mutawâtir form, then it is obligatory to make it part of one ’aqîdah.” [34] This saying contains a number of shortcomings:- [i] Differentiating between the âhâd and mutawâtir ahâdîth in matters of ’aqîdah is an innovation of the Qadariyyah and the Mu’tazilah - as has already been explained. [ii] Making tasdîq of the Punishment in the Grave, whilst forbidding a person to have ’aqîdah (belief) in it, is a contradiction in terms. Since - as has preceded in the words of al-Hâfidh Ibn Hajr - tasdîq is attesting the truth of something in the heart, which is the same as ’aqîdah and which thereby necessitates îmân. However, differentiating between tasdîq and ’aqîdah is innovated speech; opposing the way of our Salaf. Unfortunately, the likes of this innovation has been clearly stated by the present leader of Hizbut-Tahrir in Britain, when he said: “We trust it; and I encourage all of you ‘an tasaddiqû bi’adbhâbil-Qabr (to have tasdîq in the Punishment of the Grave). I encourage all of you ‘an tasaddiqû bi awdâtil-Mahdî (to have tasdîq in the coming of the Mahdî). I encourage you for that. But whoever believes in that, he is sinful.” [35] [iii] How is it possible to affirm the Punishment of the Grave with the tongue, whilst forbid ’aqîdah (belief) of it in the heart - is this not but nifâq (hypocrisy)?! Rather, îmân in the Punishment of the Grave necessitates - as a foundation - ’aqîdah in the heart!! May Allâh have mercy upon Imâm Ahmad when he said: “You should beware of speaking about an issue in which you are not preceded by a Scholar.” [36] [iv] Along with all this it must be remembered that: “It is not permissible to invent an interpretation about an Âyah, or about a Sunnah, which was not there in the time of the Salaf nor did they have any knowledge about it; nor explain it to the Ummah. Since this would imply that the Salaf were ignorant of the truth in this matter and failed to reach it, whereas the late-coming opponent is somehow guided to the truth!” [37] Imâm al-Awza’î (d. 157H) -
rahimahullâh - said: Abû Hanîfah (d.150H) -
rahimahullâh - said: So denying ’aqîdah in the Punishment of the Grave, declaring this to be something sinful and forbidden, declaring also that it is not a matter which will definitely occur, but it is a matter which may possibly occur - is speech in opposition to that of the Salafus-Sâlih - the like of which was previously uttered by only the Khawârij and a group from the Mu’tazilah; and there is no doubt in its being a deviation from the Straight Path. Likewise, outwardly affirming tasdîq and [apparently] affirming îmân in the Punishment of the Grave, whilst denying ’aqîdah in it, is a contradiction in terms - since tasdîq, îmân and ’aqîdah in the opinion of the Salaf; all imply certainty and being definite - even if the modernists dislike this! Imâm Ahmad (d.241H) -
rahimahullâh - said: An-Nâsirî (d.652H) said in
An-Nûrul-Lâmi’ (no.110): An-Nawawî (d.676H) said in
Sharh Sahîh Muslim (5/85): Imâm al-Qurtubî (d.671H) -
rahimahullâh - said: Need for Verification “So examine - may Allâh have mercy upon you - the speech of everyone you hear from, particularly in your time. Do not act in haste, nor enter into anything from it until you ask and see: Did any of the Companions of the Prophet sallallâhu ’alayhi wa sallam speak about it, or any of the Scholars. So if you find a narration from them about it, then cling to it. Do not go beyond it for anything and do not give precedence to anything over it and thus fall into the Fire.” [42] Ibn Sîrîn (d.110H) -
rahimahullâh - said: Qâdî Sharîk (d. 177H) -
rahimahallâh: So there is in what has preceded - if Allâh wills - a clear explanation for those whose hearts has been enlightened by Allâh with the light of the Revelation, and whose hearts have found peace and delight in the narrations of the Salafus-Sâlih. Indeed, it is this which brings about a firmness of understanding and is a remedy against the darkness of hizbiyyah (bigoted party-spirit). This in turn produces the purity and quality, even if numbers are small. Indeed, mere numbers in opposition to the manhaj (way) of the Salaf - the manhaj of Ahlus-Snnnah wal-Jamâ’ah - leads to nothing but deception, destruction and extreme disappointment! References 1. As quoted by Abûl-Hasan al-Ash’arî in al-Maqalâtul-Islâmiyyîn (p.430). |
|||
|